Journal of Range Management

Jnanuary 2002

Volume 55:16-22

Grazing impacts on litter and roots: perennial versus annual grasses

E. Mapfumo, M. A. Naeth, V. S. Baron, A.C. Dick and D. S. Chanasyk
Authors are Post-doctoral Fellow and Professor in Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1, Research Scientist and research scientist with Lacombe Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T4L 1W1, and Professor in Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H1.

Abstract

Soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) storage in grasslands is a function of litter and root mass production. Research on how annual grasses compare with perennials for above ground and below ground mass production, and contributions to the soil C pool under pasture management is scarce. The objective of this research was to evaluate grazing intensity effects on litter and root mass, C and N pools of perennial grasses, smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis L.) and meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rhem.), and the annual grass, winter triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Litter mass and C pool for the perennial grasses were greater than those for triticale. Litter C and N pools generally decreased with increased grazing intensity. Root mass was greater for the perennial grasses than for triticale at all grazing intensities. Meadow bromegrass generally produced more root mass than smooth bromegrass. Root C and N pools for triticale were 31 and 27%, respectively, of that for the perennial grasses. Estimated total C contribution (roots and litter) to the resistant soil organic C pool was 1.5 times greater for light compared to heavy grazing. Total C (litter + root) contribution for perennial grasses was 2.7 times greater than that for triticale. Perennial grasses provided a larger litter base and root system that promote greater storage of C in the soil compared with triticale.
Key Words: annuals, organic C, perennials, total N, sequestration
© 2002 Society for Range Management